Bad Hires Are Bleeding Your Business: Here's How To Fix Your Hiring Process

Problem of practice

In today's uncertain and volatile market environment, the demand for skills and mindset is also dynamic. Recruiters and hiring managers find that sourcing talent with the right skills and mindset is of increasing importance and urgency. But beyond time and money, the primary goal of identifying and hiring the right candidate can often be missed, which results in escalating costs, lost productivity and drooping morale. One of the causes of failure is traditional interviews, which frequently fall short, as they tend to rely on unstructured conversations, gut instincts and inconsistent evaluation criteria. As a result, they are prone to personal bias, overlooking key competencies that fail to predict real-world job performance or cultural alignment. Recent research by Timothy G. Wingate and Joshua S. Bourdage offers new insights to recruiters on how to build a better hiring process by introducing structured interviews, behavioural assessments and realistic job previews.1 These processes can reduce bias and enhance candidate engagement, benefiting both organisations and job seekers

Issue 2

Making the right hiring decisions is becoming a tightrope walk for recruiters and hiring managers. They are responsible for finding the best candidates who have the required skills and experience and can fit in with company culture – all under time and budgetary pressures .2 What is often overlooked in the rush is the cost of a bad hiring decision, which causes reduced productivity, delayed projects, demoralized team members and/or legal issues.3 Recent estimates suggest that a bad hire can cost the company as much as 30% of what that person would have earned in their first year.4 So, if you hire a manager for $80,000, you are potentially throwing away $24,000 if they don't work out. Some Human Resources (HR) agencies estimate even higher losses, ranging from $240,000 to $850,000 per employee.5 And it is not just about money; the company's reputation is also affected, making it harder to convince the good hires to come work for the business. So, how to derisk your hiring process?

Hiring starts with interviewing the candidates, but such processes are traditionally cycles of ‘rush’ talks, subjective valuations and below-par results. Hiring experts must first understand what problems lie behind the hiring process and try to think outside the box about innovative ways of transforming it.

Key principles for a better hiring process

Ÿ Clear defined goals Ÿ Structured interviews Ÿ Behavioural and situational questions Ÿ Multiple interviewers and perspectives Ÿ Applicant-centred approach Ÿ Testing for competencies

Hiring smarter

The core of the problem is a misalignment between the intended goals of interviews and their actual design and execution. Traditional interviews are often surface level, which can lead to biased and inaccurate conclusions. Interviews should serve specific purposes such as promoting the organization, gauging general traits, assessing specific KSAs (Knowledge, Skills, Abilities), determining if a candidate is a good fit, attracting the candidate and setting realistic job expectations.

The research by Wingate and Bourdage creates a roadmap on how companies should be thinking about interviews. Instead of just trying to ‘get to know’ candidates, the research suggests setting clear goals, having a solid structure, and objectively evaluating the candidates.

So, how can a company bridge this gap and create a more effective interview process? The solution can be found in a multi-faceted approach that incorporates the following key principles:

Clearly defined goals: A successful interview process needs a strategic and focused approach. An organization needs to define clear, measurable goals such as attributes or competencies related to the role, leadership potential, and cultural fit. These goals can be ranked in pre-decided order of importance for each goal for final decision making.

Structured interviews: The interviewer not only has to ask the right questions in a structured manner to reduce bias and subjectivity but also provide a detailed, realistic picture of the role and the company.6

Behavioural and situational questions: To better understand a candidate's experience, it is necessary to find more about their experience by asking behavioural and situational questions.7 For example, “Tell me about a time you dealt with a really tough client”, or “Describe a project where you hit a major roadblock and how you got past it”. This gives the hiring manager concrete examples of what a candidate is capable of. A company can also have multiple interview rounds, asking questions in a similar manner or case-based questions to assess the consistency of thought and character.

Multiple interviewers and perspectives: Having more than one interviewer can help remove any biases and create a complete picture of the candidate. Each interviewer can focus on specific areas, covering all the essential skills and qualities to get a well-rounded perspective.8

Applicant-centred approach: A company can also conduct interviews from the applicant's perspective, as it prioritizes their experience, needs and journey.9 It makes the interviews a two-way process, where candidates can evaluate the organization too, fostering transparency, respect and empathy. Some companies, for instance, provide candidates with the names and roles of their interviewers in advance or share some practice documents.

Testing for competencies: American companies like IBM, General Motors, Walmart and Accenture are checking more for competencies than degrees nowadays.10 Identifying key competencies and incorporating questions to test for them might be essential to fit into the new normal.

Management Practice Insights Vol 3

Issue 2 July-Dec 2025

Costs of better hiring

Table 1: Costs of hiring smarter

Management Practice Insights Vol 3

Issue 2

Do the above criteria sound too good to be true? But the reality is that several companies have already incorporated a mix of the above-mentioned principles in their hiring process:

Zappos: The 'Insider' Program and Cultural Fit Assessment

Zappos doesn't post about recruiting candidates, it invites applicants to be 'insiders' and engages them via online chats (clear defined goals).30 It also covers travel costs for out-of-state applicants coming for in-person interviews and their behaviour is observed the entire way (testing for competencies). While this approach strengthens employer branding and offers a holistic assessment, it requires ongoing adaptation to prevent candidates from gaming the system (multiple interviewers and perspectives).

Dealing with potential problems

However, bringing new rules or principles into an established process or dealing with existing issues is not always easy. The following Table 2 identifies the problems in interviews and possible solutions:

Management Practice Insights Vol 3

Issue 2 July-Dec 2025

Incorporating these principles in the hiring interview process can help avoid pitfalls like the ones Boeing faced during its transition from an engineering-oriented company to a finance-oriented company. The company's merger with McDonnell Douglas in 1997 brought in ill-informed hiring practices .32 Leadership under CEO James McNerney (2005–2015) gave priority to financial results over engineering value, which resulted in safety failures such as the 737 Max debacle. This shift undervalued engineering judgment, which resulted in hasty production and design errors. Boeing's example demonstrates the pitfalls of recruitment driven by short-term, bottom-line expectations rather than fundamental capabilities.

Implementing best practices

Hence, to effectively employ better hiring practices, organisations need to prioritise five areas:

Ÿ The company needs to incorporate in-depth and continuous training which includes formalized techniques, awareness of bias and candidate competency evaluation.

Ÿ Technology like ATS (digital Applicant Tracking System used to manage the recruitment process) and evaluation tools can be used to offer objective feedback. This will lead to increased efficiency.

Ÿ Standardized evaluation forms, preferably with Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS), for guiding objective scoring and ensuring consistency across interviewers, are essential for objective candidate evaluation.

Ÿ A strong feedback system, which gathers input from the interviewers and candidates and examines primary hiring data (such as quality of hire), will lead to better alignment with the organisation's objectives.

Ÿ Lastly, the company must ensure a culture shift, where leadership needs to actively lead data-driven recruitment, hold people accountable and resist subjective decision making.

Building a better hiring future

The above-mentioned blueprint for more precise interview goals, well-structured questions and insightful behavioural enquiries turns recruiting from a random process into a competitive advantage in the war for talent. Despite the required investments, this shift can lead to a huge payoff: it equips recruiters and turns hiring into a growth engine.

We welcome your thoughts – drop us a note at mpi@spjimr.org

Management Practice Insights Vol 3

Issue 2